|"about to evidence a disconnect"|
The irony of Management BS is that addicts use its platitudes as shortcuts to sounding smart or in the know. Meanwhile, it cuts down their vocabularies to a shortlist of overused stock phrases, repeated beyond any would-be intellectual value-add. And from its high pinnacle on the corporate BS pantheon, financial services are shovelling this ersatz gravitas by the truckload. I last visited the horror story just over a year ago, but the BS continues unabated. So here are another 20 howlers.
It's everywhere, apparently a necessity for US Fed coverage. Makes me think of tampons.
It's fine used as a verb - very useful - but horribly overused as a noun, for any unfilled gap or comms chasm.
This really is PR speak, as in lessons learned, sans any hint of humble pie.
While angry protesters hold placards outside office buildings complaining about fat cats and the "1%", it's perhaps stirring the pot to use a metaphor that encourages you to visualise rotund executive board members reclining on the C-suite's chaise-longues, eating swan canapés and ringing the bell for more Bolly.
More central banking bunkum, sounds like a colonic.
Or "inflection point" if you prefer, either / or. It has apparent status as investor jargon, meaning the moment when the tide turns for a firm or a market (micro or macro, you might say). Why not use pivot? Or fulcrum? Sounds like falcon. Birds of prey and fighter jets: dynamic imagery indeed.
As in something this time anniversaries something else that happened a previous time. Sounds ghastly. Thanks to Laurie for this one.
What's the difference between procyclicality and cyclicality?
Another PR speak suggestion from Laurie. Used to sound more factual and forensic than just "showing" or "meaning" something.
There have been so many "green shoots" in the economy since 2009 that you might believe that the wolf that was being cried about had appeared and then pissed all over them.
More badly overused PR speak. Repetition has undermined its initial appeal, which I suspect came from its sounding less pugilistic than 'hit' and more decisive, less flaccid than 'affect'.
Pure corporate BS. Presume this means focused rather than daydreaming or licking the windows.
I do not know what this means. However, I've looked it up and apparently it is based in science, for when underlying assumptions, laws or theories become altered.
Maybe too useful to discard, but it's just another acronym.
Sales, PR or marketing speak at its worst. Works better if you just view it as empty space on the page to pause over while reading, perhaps imagining you're anywhere else.
When heard on the lips of those on the sell side of the floor this is indeed a huge topic. It's a lot rarer to hear it shouted about from would-be buyers and actual practitioners. Also it just sounds dumb.
It's a seminar that's done for the web. Awful.
I hesitated at including this one, because it is useful in its investment and regulatory compliance contexts. Still, it gets used so often it sets off the BS alarms for my original gripe about repeating shortcuts to sounding smart. Full marks to The Economist for arbitrageur, seen earlier this month. Sounds pleasingly louche, rakish, debauched.
The current economic environment
Uttered ceaselessly by those concerned with finance today, rarely in historical comparisons to Dutch Tulips or the South Seas Bubble.
Used so often in stories about China's economy that I'm now conditioned to think it inappropriate in the context of any other country.
Have I missed any out? For the first 20, click here.